Reform California "Plain English" Voter Guide

Compiled by Carl DeMaio

VOTE for This Republican Central Committee Slate:

What IS the Central Committee?

Every County has a Republican Party Central Committee that acts as its Board of Directors with the duty to raise funds, endorse candidates, wage campaigns and grow the Party. The Orange County Republican Party has 54 elected central committee positions on the ballot this year.


It’s Time to Shake Up the Party!

It’s time to bring new energy into the Republican Party starting with our local Central Committee. That’s why Carl DeMaio has endorsed the following unity slate of grassroots activists that are running together with a commitment to grow and energize the local party!

DON'T SPLIT THE VOTE!

Vote for These Candidates to Revitalize Your Local Republican Party:

*Strategic Voting: While you may vote for up to 6 candidates in each race, please do not vote for any other candidate or candidates than those listed, as you may inadvertently knock recommended candidates out of the race. We need to spike the votes for our reform-minded candidates and let other voters split their votes for the remaining candidates.

Assembly District 59

  • Dylan J. Martin

Assembly District 67

  • Cynthia Thacker
  • Baron Night
  • Steven K. Mauss

Assembly District 68

  • Fred Whitaker
  • Paula Prizio
  • Alberta Christy
  • Timothy "Tim" Ryan Whitacre
  • Pasquale Talarico
  • Gale Oliver

Assembly District 70

  • K.C. Wolbert
  • Julian De La O

Assembly District 71

  • John C. Gresko
  • Saga Conroy
  • Walter Nirenberg
  • Nick Wilson
  • Susan Stivers
  • Linda Koelling

Assembly District 72

  • Scott Voigts
  • Autumn DiGiovanni
  • Bijan Mazarji
  • Mike Munzing
  • Thomas A. "T.J." Fuentes
  • John Briscoe

Assembly District 73

  • Hengameh (Henny) Abraham
  • John Park
  • Anthony C Kuo
  • James Mai
  • Suzanne Flores
  • John M. W. Moorlach

Assembly District 74

  • Ray Gennawey
  • Aaron Washington
  • Cody Martin
  • Laurie Davies

State & Local Ballot Measures

Prop 1 – Vote NO

Plain English Title: Raids Treatment Programs to Subsidize Government Welfare Housing

Politicians’ Ballot Title: Authorizes $6.38 Billion in Bonds to Build Mental Health Treatment Facilities; Provides Housing for the Homeless

California’s homelessness crisis will absolutely get worse if Prop 1 passes! Prop 1 raids and diverts funding from treatment programs that serve homeless people in favor of giving billions in subsidies to rich developers for expensive government-subsidized mega housing projects. The mega government housing projects that would be subsidized under Prop 1 have been criticized by numerous independent government auditors for being wasteful – costing as much as $1 million per unit! That is hardly “affordable housing!”

Prop 1 also eliminates your right to vote to reject government welfare housing projects from being placed in your neighborhood. We need to reject Prop 1 and tell politicians to use our precious funds for more efficient options like treatment and shelter beds for the homeless!

City of Huntington Beach

  1. Measure A — Vote YES
    Plain English Title: Provide More In-Person Voting Locations, Monitor Ballot Drop-Boxes, and Require Citizenship to Vote
    Politicians’ Ballot Title: City of Huntington Beach, Charter Amendment Measure No. 1
    Measure A is an election integrity measure that will push back on the reduction of in-person polling locations by California's liberal politicians. A YES vote approves this measure.
  2. Measure B — Vote YES
    Plain English Title: Prevents Flags Other than U.S., State and Local Government, Olympics, and Service Flags from Flying on City Property
    Politicians’ Ballot Title: City of Huntington Beach, Charter Amendment Measure No. 2
    Measure B effectively bans identity flags from flying on city property without a unanimous vote of the city council. A YES vote approves this measure.
  3. Measure C — Vote YES
    Plain English Title: Allows Voters to Fill Council Vacancies at Next Regular Election
    Politicians’ Ballot Title: City of Huntington Beach, Charter Amendment Measure No. 3
    Measure C allows voters to fill council vacancies, rather than allow the council to appoint someone to a vacancy — which could equate to a nearly 4-year term under current law. Under Measure C, the council would only be allowed to fill a vacancy until the next regular election in which voters would elect someone to fill the unexpired term. Measure C also modernizes some terminology in the charter, requires a 2-year budget plan, and modernizes meeting scheduling procedures for the council. A YES vote approves this measure.

City of Irvine

  1. Measure D — Vote YES
    Plain English Title: Add Two City Council Positions and Elect City Council by District instead of At-Large
    Politicians’ Ballot Title: City of Irvine, Charter Amendment to Expand City Council and Establish City Council Districts
    Measure D will lead to more accurate voter representation on the council by establishing districts, and it will require greater consensus building on the council by adding more members. A YES vote approves this measure.

City of Westminster

  1. Measure E — Vote NO
    Plain English Title: Increases City Sales Tax by 0.5%, Costing Your Family Hundreds of Dollars a Year
    Politicians’ Ballot Title: City of Westminster, Westminster Safety, Services Stabilization Measure
    Measure E is a massive tax increase that will cost your family an extra $200 or more per year. Politicians say Measure E will fund specific areas such as “safety” and “homeless” — but they use these words only because they polled these terms and they think they will entice you into supporting the measure. Measure E does NOT require politicians to spend the new sales tax on the services claimed. The city attorney even states "Proceeds of the tax ... would be deposited to the city’s general fund and available for any lawful municipal purpose." A NO vote blocks this tax hike.


Orange Unified School District

  1. Orange Unified School District Recall — Vote NO
    Extremist activists, teacher union bosses, and other special interests are trying to oust the elected members of the Orange Unified School District for putting parents and children first by voting against explicit and inappropriate materials in schools, cutting bloated budgets, and protecting parents' rights. A NO vote keeps the current board and keeps them fighting to protect parents and children first — before special interests.

State & Local Candidates

U.S. Congress Races

U.S. Senate

Steve Garvey

U.S. House of Representatives

District 40: Young Kim

District 45: Michelle Steel

District 46: Definitely NOT Lou Correa

District 47: Scott Baugh

District 49: Matt Gunderson

Legislative Candidate Races

Senate

District 37: Anthony C. Kuo

Assembly

District 59: Phil Chen

District 67: Elizabeth "Beth" Culver

District 68: Mike Tardif

District 70: Tri Ta

District 71: Kate Sanchez

District 72: Diane Dixon

District 73: Hengameh (Henny) Abraham

District 74: Laurie Davies

County Candidate Races

County Board of Supervisors

District 1: Janet Nguyen

District 3: Don Wagner

Superior Court Judge

Seat 3: Jason Baez

Seat 16: Richard Zimmer

Seat 35: Whitney Bokosky

Board of Education

District 1: Jorge Valdes

District 3: Dr. Ken L. Williams

District 4: Tim Shaw

Print & Share the Guide!

We need YOUR help to share this voter guide with key voters before the March 5th California Primary Election! Print a copy of the guide below!

Print Voter Guide

Contribute to Help Distribute Voter Guide

We need YOUR help to share this voter guide with key voters before the March 5th California Primary Election! Please consider chipping in to our efforts today!

CONTRIBUTE: Help Distribute "Plain English" Voter Guide
Ad Paid for by Reform Local Government PAC – FPPC #1452276.
Advertisement was not authorized by a candidate or a committee controlled by a candidate.